Sep 10

News briefs:July 9, 2006

The time is 18:00 (UTC) on July 9th, 2006, and this is Audio Wikinews News Briefs.


  • 1 Headlines
    • 1.1 Passenger airplane crashes in Siberia
    • 1.2 India successfully test-fires Agni-III missile
    • 1.3 Communal tensions rise in Mumbai as Shiv Sainiks protest desecration of statue
    • 1.4 Belated New Jersey budget passes, ending most of the shutdown
    • 1.5 Tory leader to make ‘hoodie’ plea
    • 1.6 Indian royal family disinherits gay scion
    • 1.7 Missing French girls Emeline and Melissa found safe
    • 1.8 Elderly man’s mutilated body found in Wellington’s south coast, NZ
  • 2 Closing statements


Posted in Uncategorized
Sep 07

Can Training Leadership Be Beneficial To Everyone?

By Chris D’Cruz

It is easy to explain what a good leader should be and what leadership qualities he should have in him but it is not that easy to practice them in a real life scenario. Every person cannot be a leader and every leader may not contain the traits he need to be a successful leader. So, if you really want to be a leader you have to learn how to be one. A good leader is like an attractive force which helps the team and the organization in order to perform the task and to grow. They take care of both the needs of people and the aims of the company. A good leader is not necessary a technical expert or at the top in hierarchy. Nowadays, it depends more on his attitude and behavior towards people in cases he wants the team to work under him and do what he says in order to produce an effective output. Thus, you have to learn to be a leader and due to such advancements in technology this is no more a problem because of the training leadership courses available.

Leadership qualities include integrity, honesty, courage, commitment, sincerity, confidence, determination and a positive attitude. These qualities come by nature within a person but you need some training to polish your capabilities. You have to trust in yourself and you really should want to do become a leader as it requires a lot of patience as well. The main objective of these leadership training courses is that you can have a better understanding of how a leader should behave in a given situation, you should understand the difference between leadership and management and you should define your qualities and strengths. These training courses will help you when you have to make key decisions, when you have to identify what’s going on around you, it also helps you polish your interpersonal and communication skills. You will become more flexible and optimistic towards a situation at hand, which will help you in dealing a crisis or a change in a much better way. Another important factor that makes you an outstanding leader is your ability to use your mind power when you need it. Mind power is your ability to use your will power in a situation when you have to make a decision or choose between two things. Your mind power helps you motivate others as well as you so that you feel more confident in what you are doing and the workforce has more faith in the leader. Mind power also includes your assessment of the people around you and how you should deal with them in order to keep them satisfied and willing to do your work.

YouTube Preview Image

Thus, these training leadership courses are of great benefit if you make the best out of it. You will be more confident when you have to actually play the role of a leader as now you will be able to better understand their as your problems. You will be able to play a stronger role in improving the growth of your company and in increasing the morale of the team.

About the Author:

Click Here

to download your FREE “Life Success Secrets” package. It normally sells for $47 but for a limited time only, you can grab it for free. Discover the secrets to a fuller, richer life with this free package at


Permanent Link:

Jan 20

The Unique Benefits Leasing And Buying Vehicles Offers Individuals

See More About:

The Unique Benefits Leasing and Buying Vehicles offers Individuals



Some people want to own their own vehicles, while others prefer to lease. Whichever option you choose, there are reputable dealerships that can help you make the right decision. Each option offers its own unique benefits. For many people, the final decision rests on convenience, budget, and lifestyle.

Leasing should never be confused with renting or owning a vehicle. Leasing entitles individuals to the use of a vehicle for a fixed period (usually between two to four years); whereas buying finances the purchase of a vehicle. Moreover, once the typical lease expires, the vehicle is usually returned to the leasing company.

YouTube Preview Image

Leasing offers individuals many benefits. Unlike vehicle purchasing, leasing does not require the lessor to provide a down payment. This can be a boon for individuals who do not have the capital to make the down payment needed for vehicle purchase. In addition, monthly payments for vehicle leases tend to be smaller than the monthly amortization for vehicle purchase. Leasing is also suitable for individuals with a lot of disposable income who may wish to lease the latest vehicle for a couple of months or years and then return it. This option is suitable for individuals who want to enjoy the latest vehicleswith all their upgrades and trimswithout committing to vehicle ownership.

For owners of small businesses and the self-employed, choosing between leasing or buying a vehicle may be more difficult to make. While leasing is a good way for small businesses to gain the use of fleet vehicles for work-related transportation, small business owners will be essentially making monthly payments for a vehicle they do not own. Thankfully, dealerships that offer used vehicles Regina

businesses need can help prospective buyers and lessors make the right decision.

On another note, purchasing a vehicle offers the car buyer some unique benefits. While monthly car payments are substantially larger than monthly lease payments, they offer the buyer the satisfaction of owning a vehicle. Moreover, the long-term cost of leasing vehicles is always more expensive than the long-term cost of vehicle purchasing. Individuals who remain undecided can visit dealerships that offer used vehicles Regina

residents need.

Leasing or buying used vehicles Regina

dealerships have can reflect on an individuals values, lifestyle, and budget. Lessors enjoy changing cars every few years, want cars with the latest upgrades and safety features, desire lower monthly payments, and may dislike the trade-in process for old vehicles. On the other hand, car buyers welcome the idea of car ownership, are willing to make monthly payments for a period of time, and then enjoy their cars debt-free for many years to come.

If you have questions, please visit us at for complete details and answers.

Article Source:

Posted in Uncategorized
Jan 20

Volkswagen emissions scandal may affect thousands more cars

Wednesday, November 4, 2015 

The Volkswagen emissions scandal continued yesterday with the company announcing 800,000 mainly diesel vehicles may also be affected by carbon dioxide emissions problems.

The company stated “the safety of the vehicles is in no way compromised”. They estimated potentially this could cost them €2bn on top of the €6.7bn set aside to pay for the cost of correcting 11 million cars affected when the scandal broke, in addition to fines by regulators.

This follows Monday’s revelation that the emissions scandal has affected up to 10,000 vehicles sold in the USA by brands in the Volkswagen group, although the company refutes the allegation. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the regulatory body which has been investigating Volkswagen, claims the company fitted a number of recent Audi, Porsche, and Volkswagen models with technology that initiates secret components during emission tests to ensure the results are favourable.

The scandal began with damaging revelations that the car manufacturer has been using illegal software to enable diesel cars to cheat on mandatory emissions tests. This lead to a public apology on September 20 by then-chief executive Martin Winterkorn and the promise of an outside inquiry. He then resigned on September 23, and was replaced by Matthias Müller. The new allegation about Porsche is of particular concern for Müller, because he had previously been in charge of Porsche.

The company is expected to foot the bill for the recall of close to 500,000 VW and Audi cars affected at the time. There is also the possibility of Volkswagen having to pay federal fines of up to US$18 billion dollars because the US Clean Air Act sets a maximum fine of US$37,500 for each vehicle that contravenes the requirements of the Act.

An investigation into alleged breaches of environmental law was originally initiated on the advice of the International Council on Clean Transportation, a European non-governmental organisation. The EPA requested tests be carried out by West Virginia University, where the secret software was discovered.

The software, known as a “defeat device”, enabled cars to identify when they were being tested and to switch on the emission control system. The devices may have been adding urea to the car exhaust because that would reduce the amount of nitrogen dioxide. The car would release a fraction of the nitrogen oxide compared to when they were being driven normally. Emissions of nitrogen oxide contribute to smog and are thought to have caused a rise in respiratory illnesses like asthma.

Posted in Uncategorized
Jan 19

UK company “seriously considering” GPS tracking devices in school uniforms

Saturday, August 25, 2007 

The leading supplier of school uniforms in the United Kingdom, Lancashire-based manufacturer Trutex, has announced it is “seriously considering” including GPS tracking devices in future ranges of its uniform products after conducting an online survey of both parents and children.

“As a direct result of the survey, we are now seriously considering incorporating a [tracking] device into future ranges” said Trutex marketing director Clare Rix.

The survey questioned 809 parents and 444 children aged nine to 16. It showed that 44% of parents were worried about the safety of pre-teen children, and 59% wanted tracking devices installed in school apparel. 39% of children aged nine to 12 were prepared to wear clothing with tracking devices in them, while teenagers were notably less enthusiastic and more wary of what Trutex has admitted they see as a “big brother” concept.

However, Trutex has claimed the tracking devices would bring about worthwhile benefits, including being a valuable resource for parents who wanted to keep a close eye on where their children were at all times.

“As well as being a safety net for parents, there could be real benefits for schools who could keep a closer track on the whereabouts of their pupils, potentially reducing truancy levels” says Rix.

Each year, Trutex supplies 1 million blouses, 1.1 million shirts, 250,000 pairs of trousers, 20,000 blazers, 60,000 skirts and 110,000 pieces of knitwear to the UK.

It is not the first company to manufacture school uniforms with a central focus on child safety; last week Essex firm BladeRunner revealed it was selling stab-proof school blazers to parents concerned about violence against their children. The blazers were outfitted with Kevlar, a synthetic fibre used in body armour. It has already received orders internationally, including Australia.

If the Trutex tracking devices go ahead, it is unclear where in the uniform they will be located.

Posted in Uncategorized
Oct 12

Outdoor Furniture Cushion Replacement

Outdoor Furniture Cushion Replacement


Percy Webb

They won\\’t spring back into place whenever you get up, but instead, remain sunken.

If you would like patio furniture replacement seat coverings, know that there is plenty of selection. The primary stop, of course, is your local home improvement retail store or patio store. If you have really nice outdoor household furniture, you may find the choice limited, however.

With the asking price of gas, you could save some time and money going online instead. There are top-notch retailers on the online market place these days that sell patio furniture replacement cushions.

One some great benefits of shopping online is which you could often custom order your cushions. This means it is possible to select the colors, this patterns and sometimes, even the fabric.

YouTube Preview Image

When ordering patio furniture replacement cushions you need to be careful to ensure they are going to fit. To guarantee a superb fit, measure your active cushions, including their longer, depth and thickness. When you shop for cushions, keep these measurements in mind, but there are some techniques \\”cheat\\” the system.

As an example, if you have a three-cushion sofa, you could possibly transform into a two cushion if you realise the right sized substitute cushions. You may also find that a back cushion for just one type of furniture may well fit the seat involving yours.

Of course, if you bought a name brand set, it can be much simpler to purchase patio furniture replacement cushions later on in life. That\\’s because that same manufacturer are going to be around in the years to come and there is some measure of standardization that is included with going with a well-known company.

If you need brand-new cushions, you can get started with the tags on should never set. A lot of times the maker has a number you can call whenever you reorder from a trader. It\\’s probably not worth your time contacting the manufacturer directly as they simply often don\\’t deal using customers.

If you\\’re looking online for patio furniture replacement cushions, start by seeking out \\”replacement patio cushions\\” or \\”new garden furniture cushions\\”. These should get you started on your journey and within several minutes you should be able to find just what you\\’re looking for.

If you can\\’t find the exact color of the old cushions, don\\’t get worried. Like any fashion, colors change after a while. This actually could be the opportunity to find new colors that perhaps match your new d?? cor or the new look of your property.

When you\\’re looking for garden furniture replacement cushions, try to get ones with poly filling. While it may be tempting to buy foam cushions, like those in your house, they act like a sponge outdoors and will stay wet long after having a brief shower has previous. The poly fill dries quickly and readily returns to help its original shape.

Once you get your patio home furnishings replacement cushions, be sure you need to do preventative maintenance on them. This includes cleaning them every season and applying a water-resistant coating on them just before putting them away for the winter. Your patio furniture substitute cushions will last considerably longer if you store them inside during the off season.

Patio furniture can be a significant good addition to a residence. This adds to the atmosphere on the town and also brings artistic price for website visitors. Furthermore, it gives you this property owners through an more region which they re able to do almost anything they really want. It could be similar to proudly owning an additional space with out making together with getting straight down everything.

Know the natural environment encircling your terrace. This will help y

Article Source:

Posted in Uncategorized
Oct 12

Comments from feedback form – “What do you think of this page…”

BKCW8: As someone who’s primarily a reader, I don’t know how this community works– but let me assure you I was completely serious.

Actually, the first line alone is ridiculous, ignoring the sheer surreality of the rest of the tirade directed at an anonymous user who arguably did not deserve a single jot of his hate.

As far as I know, this site is for the readers, right? Attacking them for voicing an opinion about quality ain’t going to help matters. If everyone who was ever dissatisfied with an article should either stop reading or “write a fucking article”, guess which they’re going to choose?

I apologise if I am unqualified to comment on this, or if this is the wrong place to do so.

Sonia: Just as a note, BKCW8’s response shouldn’t be taken as any sort of official opinion of wikinews.

As far as your original question goes, the post was in violation of Wikinews:Etiquette.

With that said, it can be annoying when people say something is crap, without explaining why. People work hard on the article contents, and well constructive criticism is always a good thing, negative comments without explaining why or suggestions for improvement aren’t that helpful. However, it is still inappropriate to attack a reader for fulling out a “What do you think of this article form” honestly.

Bawolff: I have replied to Sonia and I made it clear I am no official =)

To be fair, it should be pointed out that my comments do not officially represent wikinews either. 🙂 (although as an admin, I guess they represent a little authority, but in general all my opinions are just my own and nobody else’s).

What do you say? Should we delete this whole thread on the grounds that Wikinews is not a theater of war”? One person did not like the article and trolled, another took the bait, and both should be embarrassed.

I don’t really think thats necessary. (but then again I’m a very anti-deletionist person).

Are you kidding? Even though Turtlestack has apologized, we cannot simply leave personal attacks and threats of physical violence here for anyone to gawk at. An admin should delete this thread, or at least Turtlestack’s initial comment, immediately.

Exsqueeze me?

This is the comments namespace! Anarchy reigns supreme!

You do not censor the opinions posted here because, well, frankly, virtually no policies apply.

So, rattle your jewellery, or clap your hands; just don’t take this page seriously.

No, it doesn’t. We have the right to remove blatant attacks, threats, personal information and similar material, as well as copyright violations and other illegal items. If I wrote down your full name, address, medical history, and other related material, would you take that seriously? I certainly would. Anarchy does not reign supreme here, and we can censor any material not adhering to our policies. Because they do apply here.

AFAIU, there is a very short list of things that will get removed from comments pages, and an even shorter list of things that will get you banned. These aren’t talk pages, they’re comments pages for all the trolls on the net to blast with whatever crap they want;).

The List, as I understand it:

1) Linking to an external non-WMF site (link removed, post can sometimes remain)

2) Personal attacks against non-public people (ie, famous people don’t count), usually other commenters, that are sufficiently bad to warrant action (this is judged on a per-post basis, and different admins will make different calls)

3) Clearly libellous statements against public figures. (post deleted)

4) Copyright infringement (post deleted, warning issued on user talk page, possible ban in repeated)

5) Death threats, that are clearly not a joke (local ban, likely global ban, possibly alert WMF, possible referral to local authorities if deemed necessary)

6) Serious sounding suicide notes/threats (always alert WMF, always constant local authorities)

7) Advertising (insta-ban)

If Turtle’s comment violated any of those, it would be number 2. Everyone has a different threshold for what constitutes a personal attack. Personally I’d be inclined to leave his post, since while it’s angry, it’s somewhat humorous as well.

I would hope that threats of physical harm are lumped in with death threats, and that humor doesn’t end up playing too big a role in any such administrative decision.

It’s not so much a question of the existence of a threat as it is the seriousness of the threat. Paraphrased: “I’m going to make a giant wooden hand, cover it in pubic hair, and then push it over on you at your doorstep” isn’t the most serious sounding threat in the world.

Here’s a serious sounding threat, as an example: “I work at an ISP. I’m going to use your IP to hunt down your RL name and address. I’m then going to go your house in the middle of the night and make sure you’re home. Then I’m going to bar all the doors. Then I’m going to toss a firebomb through a window. Then I’m going to sit on your lawn and laugh while you scream.”

That’s a far more serious sounding threat, because that’s realistic enough that even if the author of the threat has no intention of carrying it out, it may well still cause angst to the recipient of the threat. And that’s the real test. Is the threat of a type that might cause real worry to the recipient, or is it just part of a trolling flamewar? There’s a difference between the two, and they should be treated differently.

And indeed, “humorous” is not part of the test of what’s allowable and what’s not. I was thinking about “seriousness”, but wrote “humour” due to the fact that there is a bit of crossover between the two concepts in my mind (ie, a post wouldn’t be funny if it contains a serious threat).

HEREEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEES Bradley…I’d say move this thread to the archives to set a precedent for future Meanie Beanie Fophenies

Man you people must have nothing better to do….

There is really nothing better to do than using the free voice of democracy…

I think the comment does violate no. 2, because vulgarity is only used for two purposes: 1) to be friendly with someone else; 2) to attack someone. Number two is surely the case here.

@bawolff: I did have my fair bit of fun writing this article. 🙂

*ignores possible policy violations*

Posted in Uncategorized
Oct 11

United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is a United States House of Representatives committee that has existed in varying forms since 1816.

The Committee on Oversight and Government Reform is the main investigative committee in the U.S. House of Representatives. After Republicans gained control of the House in 1995, the committee was reorganized to include just seven subcommittees. This reorganization consolidated the jurisdiction previously covered by 3 full committees and 14 subcommittees, and resulted in a 50 percent cut in staff.[1] In 2007, Henry Waxman, (D-CA) the chairman of the committee proposed an additional reorganization which combined the duties of the seven previous subcommittees into five. This reorganization was adopted by the full committee January 18, 2007.[2]

As of the 114th Congress, the Chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah and the Ranking Member is Maryland Congressman Elijah Cummings.

The Committee’s government-wide oversight jurisdiction and expanded legislative authority make it one of the most influential and powerful committees in the House. The Committee serves as Congress’ chief investigative and oversight committee, and is granted broad jurisdiction. The chairman of the committee is the only committee chairman in the House with the authority to issue subpoenas without a committee vote.[3] However, in recent history, it has become practice to refrain from unilateral subpoenas.[4]

It first appeared as the Committee on Expenditures in the Executive Departments, which was created in 1927 by consolidating the 11 Committees on Expenditures previously spread among the various departments of the federal government to oversee how taxpayer monies were spent. The Committee’s immediate predecessor, the Committee on Government Operations, was established in 1952. The name change was intended to communicate the primary function of the committee: to study “the operations of Government activities at all levels with a view to determining their economy and efficiency.” It is the Committee’s government-wide oversight jurisdiction that sets it apart from other House committees. The committee was renamed in the 106th Congress as the Committee on Government Reform. While retaining the agenda of the former Committee on Government Operations, the Committee also has the responsibilities of the former Committee on Post Office and Civil Service and the Committee on the District of Columbia. On January 4, 2007, the 110th Congress changed its name to its current name.

This Committee was very active during President Bill Clinton’s term; it issued 1,052 subpoenas to probe alleged misconduct by the Clinton Administration and the Democratic Party between 1997 and 2002, at a cost of more than $35 million. Under this period, subpoenas could only be issued by the Committee chair, a rule change during the Clinton administration to facilitate investigations without delays caused by objections from minority members. By contrast, in the period between 1998 and 2007, chairman Thomas M. Davis and the Republican majority had permitted three subpoenas to the Bush administration, including one to the Defense Department over Hurricane Katrina documents.[5] The Boston Globe reported that an “examination of committees’ own reports found that the House Government Reform Committee held just 37 hearings described as “oversight” or investigative in nature during the last Congress, down from 135 such hearings held by its predecessor, the House Government Operations Committee, in 1993–94, the last year the Democrats controlled the chamber.”[6]

There was high interest in the priorities of the then newly installed Chairman Henry Waxman (D-CA) who told reporters after the November elections that “The most difficult thing will be to pick and choose” what to investigate.[7] Congressional leaders also renamed the Committee and five of its subcommittees to emphasize its new commitment to oversight responsibilities, and added a subcommittee on transparency.[8]

Between 2000 and 2006, various scandals were in the news that generated one or no subpoenas for testimony or documents. These events include the September 11, 2001 attacks, a leak of classified or secret information naming Central Intelligence Agency agent Valerie Plame, abuses and war crimes traced to the CIA in Abu Ghraib prison, evidence that charges that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction were knowingly false, illegal campaign contributions by lobbyists including Jack Abramoff, billions of dollars in preventable damage and thousands of deaths due to an incompetent response by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and its contractors during Hurricane Katrina in the U.S. Gulf Coast, and the suppression of accepted scientific data such as that of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration supporting the theory of global warming by Philip Cooney. After revelations in the Downing Street memo, a document containing incriminating information on the buildup to the Iraq War, Democrats in the minority were refused even a hearing chamber and were forced to meet in the basement of the U.S. Capitol Building on the matter.[9]

Since the November 2006 elections, The Washington Post published a series of investigative articles on the poor Congressional oversight of government contracts.[10][11][12][13]

The committee, under Davis’s chairmanship, launched two notable investigations that were considered controversial. One was an inquiry into the decision to remove life support from Terri Schiavo. The Committee issued a subpoena, without any Democratic objections, requiring Schiavo to “appear” so that members could “examine nutrition and hydration which incapacitated patients receive as part of their care.” The apparent objective of this, beyond providing a learning opportunity to committee members, was to delay the pending termination of Schiavo’s life, whose wishes were in dispute, while the Congress considered federal legislation specifically targeted at Schiavo’s death order.[14] Minority members opposed the action. Chairman Davis said it was “a legitimate legislative inquiry.”[15] Davis issued a joint statement with House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) and Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (R-Illinois) that stated: “This inquiry should give hope to Terri, her parents and friends, and the millions of people throughout the world who are praying for her safety. This fight is not over.”[15][16]

Another controversial investigation was one into the use of anabolic steroids by players in Major League Baseball.[17] The trigger for the hearings was publication of a memoir, Juiced: Wild Times, Rampant ‘Roids, Smash Hits & How Baseball Got Big, by Jose Canseco.

They also investigated World Wrestling Entertainment regarding their talent wellness/drug policies, after speculation of possible links between steroid use and the death of WWE performer Chris Benoit.[18]

On July 8, 2009, the Committee Republicans released an investigative staff report discussing the financial collapse of 2008–2009.[19] The report alleges that the government was the cause of the collapse, due what it described as government meddling in the United States housing and lending market in the name of “affordable housing”.

The committee hold hearings and conducts investigations as part of its oversight duty.

March 23, 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act was passed that would “require all employers to cover birth control free of cost to women”.[20] In January 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services released the rules governing religious institutions that needed a Conscience clause. Those new rules were widely condemned for infringing on the Free Exercise Clause.

In February 2012, the committee held a hearing entitled, “Lines Crossed: Separation of Church and State. Has the Obama Administration Trampled on Freedom of Religion and Freedom of Conscience?” [2]

The hearing “was supposed to be about religious freedom and a mandate that health insurers cover contraception in the United States”, according to ABC News,[21] which also reported that “Issa said the hearing is meant to be more broadly about religious freedom and not specifically about the contraception mandate in the Health Reform law.”

The agenda, speakers list, and topics were finalized and published Monday, February 13, and were divided into two panels, the first, in the morning, to be of clergy/religious leaders/theologians, who could authoritatively speak for various religious denominations about their needs or lack thereof for a conscience clause, to hear testimony from leaders of different faiths who “are concerned that government, under this Administration, is encroaching on their First Amendment rights.”[22]

The second panel met in the afternoon, and was composed of lay or religious leaders of religious-affiliated institutions that would be affected by the wording of the conscience clause.[23] Democrats were offered two spots on each of the two panels, but failed to nominate any speakers by the 13th. Rep. Issa verbally confirmed that Democrats had asked Rev Barry Lynn, a prominent theologian, to speak, and his name was added to the speakers list, though without topics, or assignment to a panel, since no complete written nomination had been received by deadline.

On the day of the hearing, Democrats demanded the committee also add Sandra Fluke, a woman enrolled at Georgetown, to the panel (clergy) that had just sat, and that she be allowed to speak “now”, but committee chairman Issa said Democrats could not add their witness because she was not a member of the clergy.[21]

As an accommodation, Ms. Fluke’s speech at a media event from the previous week (substantially the same as the speech she intended to give), was added to the hearing record,[24] Criticism of the views contained in that speech, (which was also delivered again a week later at a venue outside the Committee) especially by Rush Limbaugh, launched the Rush Limbaugh–Sandra Fluke controversy.

Issa, who chairs the House Oversight Committee, announced that he is investigating the Justice Department’s actions in prosecuting Swartz’s case.[25] In a statement to the Huffington Post, Issa praised Swartz’s work toward “open government and free access to the people.” Issa’s investigation has garnered some bipartisan support.[26]

On January 28, House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform chairman Issa and ranking member Elijah Cummings published a letter to Attorney General Holder, questioning whether prosecutors intentionally added felony counts to increase the amount of time Swartz faced in prison.[27] Indeed, the former 4 felony counts on July 14, 2011, jumped to 13 counts on Sept. 12, 2012.[28] Their letter read, in part:

It appears that prosecutors increased the felony counts by providing specific dates for each action, turning each marked date into its own felony charge, and significantly increasing Mr. Swartz’s maximum criminal exposure to up to 50 years imprisonment and $1 million in fines.[28]

Boston’s WBUR has reported that US Attorney in charge for the Swartz prosecution, Carmen Ortiz, is expected to testify before the committee’s upcoming probe into the handling of the Aaron Swartz case.[29]

Oversight and Government Reform Subcommittees Website

Posted in Uncategorized
Sep 25

Wigs You Wish They Hadn\\’t Used In The Movies

Wigs You Wish They Hadn\\’t Used In The Movies


Keith Fernandes

It takes a lot of effort and preparation on the part of an actor to get into the character that he or she is supposed to be playing. The preparation not only involves getting the dialogue, the accent and the body nuances right, but also means getting into the look of the character.

Sometimes, getting into the look will involve changing your hairstyle and color. It may so happen that an actor may be shooting simultaneously for two films. In such a situation, the actor has to take care to maintain the continuity of both the films and hence he or she may have to resort to a wig in one movie and style his or her natural hair for the other movie.

While the actors have no problems with getting accustomed to wigs, there are some wigs that have ruined the role despite a good performance.

YouTube Preview Image

This article takes a look at some of the worst wigs seen on screen.

1.Rachel McAdams in Mean Girls: Remember Regina George, the Queen Bee of The Plastics – well yeah, she wore a wig. Rachel McAdams, who played Regina George was working on another movie at the same time as Mean Girls and so, she couldn\\’t dye her hair blonde as the character required. In order to play the role to perfection, she wore a wig while filming her parts. But the wig did not play its role well. The lifeless blonde wig did nothing to accentuate her performance as the horrible and wily, Regina George.

2.Ginnifer Goodwin in He\\’s Just Not That Into You: Ginnifer played the role of the romantically vulnerable Gigi Phillips to perfection. In real life Ginnifer sports a short cropped hairdo that really suits her. However, for this film, she had to wear an unflattering bob style wig. With that hair, no wonder she couldn\\’t find love in the movie, until the very end.

3.Emilia Clarke in Game of Thrones: Emilia Clarke brought to life the character of Daenerys Targaryen, the exiled daughter of the king. The character is supposed to have silver hair but the wig that the wardrobe department came up with was atrocious. It didn\\’t impact her performance but it did make the viewer want to yank the wig out of the way.

4.Christina Aguilera in Burlesque: Christina Aguilera made her debut as an actress in this movie. Her character Ali Rose is club dancer and for this role, Aguilera had to wear different wigs for the performances. However, the hair that has been shown as her original hair in the movie is also a wig and though the color did seem a mellow change from her own peroxide blonde hair, it still looked like a wig, which was a disappointment.

There are several movies that have made the stars look like a joke because of the wrong hairdo. Most actors have managed to give a stellar performance despite the wig. However, the entire look and feel of the character is lost due to one wardrobe department error.

Are you looking for

celebrity style wigs

? Jenny\\’s Hairsense offers celebrity hairstyle in an instant within your budget. Visit this


to explore wigs of different color and styles they has on offer.

Article Source:

Posted in Uncategorized